Friday, August 02, 2002

THINK AGAIN: The limits of empathy
Jonathan Rosenblum

Nothing so ennobles a human being as his capacity for empathy, particularly with those very different from himself. Without the ability to see the world from the vantage point of another, no deep human relationship is possible.

Empathy for the suffering of the Palestinians has long been a hallmark of Israeli life. More than 20 years ago, novelist Cynthia Ozick observed that one can go into any coffee house in Israel and hear earnest discussions about the plight of the Palestinians. Yet one could travel the length and breadth of the Arab world without hearing a sympathetic discussion of the tragedy of Jewish history, or meeting an intellectual interested in understanding the importance of a tiny sliver of land to a people who has suffered so greatly at the hands of the nations.

Nothing has changed today.

Few, if any, Israelis rejoiced last week at the news of 14 Palestinian civilians, including nine children, killed together with arch-terrorist Salah Shehadeh in Gaza. There may have been those who felt that the elimination of Shehadeh was worth it, even in retrospect, given the magnitude of the attacks he was planning. But even they were saddened by the loss of life. (I hesitate to use the word "innocent" when referring to those who likely viewed Shehadeh as a hero.)

Not one Jew rushed out into the street to pass out candies, shoot off machine guns, or ululate in celebration of Palestinian deaths. Even upon the death of our most bitter enemies, Jews are instructed not to rejoice (see Proverbs 24:17), and we all grew up removing 10 drops from our wine cups at the Pessah Seder in memory of the Egyptians drowned in the sea.

No medals were awarded in a festive public ceremony to the pilot who dropped the bomb on Shehadeh's house, like the public ceremonies organized by the Palestinian Authority on July 18 to honor the families of suicide bombers and subsequently broadcast on PA TV.

There comes a point, however, where empathy for others becomes something else entirely. When the empathy for one's enemies is stronger than for one's brothers, it becomes unnatural, inhuman. Much of the Israeli breast-beating last week falls into this category.

David Forman of Rabbis for Human Rights accused Israel in these pages of having adopted "the tactics of our enemies ... [and having] thrown all moral caution to the wind."

Nir Baram in Ma'ariv found no distinction between us and Hamas: "Just as we were about to kill the enemy, our Shehadeh, we suddenly realized how much we resemble him... [W]hen we killed him, we killed one of our own."

Even the normally sensible Ari Shavit termed the killing of Shehadeh a "terrorist attack" perpetuated by Israel.

Bar-Ilan University professor Menachem Klein, on sabbatical at Oxford, delighted the British press by charging that "the existence of Palestinian civilians and their right to life has been deleted from the screen of Israelis."

These statements and many more like them lack moral seriousness because they elide the distinctions that form the basis of all moral reasoning. The elimination of Shehadeh was not designed to spread terror among Palestinian civilian population but to prevent the murder of Israeli civilians. Sowing terror is the purpose of suicide bombings.

Far from being insensitive to Palestinian civilian casualties, Israel has often been oversensitive. There are 13 bereaved Jewish families today because of the hypersensitivity shown by the IDF in Jenin to civilian casualties. Shehadeh himself lived to plan several terrorist attacks because the IDF repeatedly passed up opportunities to kill him due to concern about likely civilian casualties.

The equation of Jews and Palestinians is nothing short of obscene. No Israeli has placed a 10-month-old baby in his rifle sites and blown off her head as she lay in her mother's arms, or shot between the eyes a five-year-old surrounded by her dolls, or looked for a crowd of mothers pushing baby carriages among which to blow himself up.

I doubt there are a more than a couple of hundred Israelis who advocate retaliating against Palestinian civilians, and no more than a few dozen actually capable of doing so. Poll after poll, however, has shown that more than a million Palestinians, not to mention tens of millions of their Arab brothers, fully support suicide bombings, and the waiting lists to carry out such bombings number in the thousands.

JUDAISM DOES not view human life according to some utilitarian calculus. If an enemy surrounded a city and demanded that the inhabitants turn over 10 people for execution or the whole city would be put to the sword, it would be forbidden to turn over the 10. It is therefore inadequate to say that the number of Palestinians who died together with Shehadeh was less than the number of Israelis who would likely have died if he had been left alive.

But we are at war, and in war no nation treats the lives of its citizens or soldiers as of equal value to those of its enemy. When UN peacekeepers in Somalia found themselves surrounded and under fire, they did not hesitate to mow down hundreds of civilians together with their attackers. That does not mean that a nation may wantonly kill enemy civilians, but neither Halacha nor the law of warfare affords civilians absolute protection. Moreover, the law of war places the onus for civilian deaths on legitimate military targets who use those civilians as shields.

Many of the nations so quick to condemn Israel last week have themselves shown little concern with potential civilian casualties when eliminating "enemies" posing a far less immediate threat to their citizens than Shehadeh posed to Israel.

Does anyone imagine, for instance, that had the United States traced Osama bin Laden to a cave in Tora Bora it would have tarried a minute to ascertain how many family members were with him before unleashing its full firepower?

European Mideast envoy Javier Solana, who last week condemned Israel's "extrajudicial killing operation, which targeted a densely populated area," ordered cluster bombs dropped on Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic's bunker in a densely populated area when he was NATO secretary-general. Milosevic had not yet been tried by any court nor did he pose a threat to any NATO country.

No sane rule of law permits Hamas to target Israeli citizens but forbids Israel from responding. What, then, can Ha'aretz's Gideon Levy mean when he argues that Israel may only intercept suicide bombers on their way to carry out attacks, but not kill those planning the attacks? Are only lowly privates legitimate military targets, but not the generals who direct them?

So much, too, for Yossi Beilin's claim that Shehadeh was not a ticking time bomb and that his elimination constituted the imposition of an extrajudicial death penalty. Shehadeh was not killed as retribution for the hundreds of Jewish lives he had already claimed, but to prevent him from taking more. As the mastermind of impending attacks, about which there was apparently very good intelligence information, he was the obvious target - the head of the snake.

Empathy - yes; moral sensitivity - by all means. But not at the cost of more Jewish lives.

Thursday, August 01, 2002

Another trustworthy Arab speaks out...

Hamas Leader Says Americans Not a Target

...yeah. They were just lucky bonus'

The militant Islamic group Hamas denied on Thursday it had deliberately targeted U.S. citizens in a deadly bomb blast at a cafeteria frequented by foreign students at Jerusalem's Hebrew University.

Four Americans and a French-American student were among seven killed when a bomb planted by Hamas blew up in the university cafeteria during the lunch hour rush on Wednesday.

More than 80 people were wounded in the attack.

Wednesday, July 31, 2002

I knew I wasn't dedicated enough!

After taking this survey, it turns out that:

37.5 %

My weblog owns 37.5 % of me.
Does your weblog own you?
Not since inventing the zero have the Arabs made such shocking discoveries....

King Abdullah: Arabs don't trust US

...the king said democratic and free market reforms in "Palestine" would mean little if Israel can bring commerce and daily life to a halt as it has in response to Palestinian suicide attacks.

Abdullah said the importance of the US role in resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict is universally recognized.

"Yet," he said, "I must tell you that Arab trust of US influence remains rather low."

"This is all the more reason for the US to show its commitment to fairness and freedom and lead the way to peace," Abdullah said.

I've been silent

I know that many of our readers are wondering why I haven't commented on the latest attack in Israel, that left 7 students from a Jerusalem university dead. I don't feel that there is much to say. You all know how I'm feeling, because if you read this site on a regular basis, you probably feel the same way. There is no point posting a link to the most recent CNN report because you've all read about it already. But I will say one thing. Now more than ever (and I know how"un-constructive" this may be, yet I could care less), I feel that the world wouldn't be a worse place if every Palestinian weren't here. I don't care what Peres says - Palestinians aren't peaceful people and they don't want peace. I don't care what Bush says - Islam is one of the greatest tradgedies to happen to planet earth, not a beautiful and misunderstood religion with much to offer. And another thing, "Colon" Powell can condemn the Palestinians all he wants, but the damage he has done by asking Israelis to show restraint is irreversible. He should never be forgiven. No more half-assed retaliations. No more concessions and offerings. Israel should strike, strike hard and strike with intentions to kill and bring fear to the hearts of anyone who would think of bringing terror to the only legitimate civilization in the region. I've said it before and I hope I never say it again - enough is enough. Let's end this thing. Mollix, don't even bother.....

Tuesday, July 30, 2002

The exceptional Christie Blatchford spends Shabbos with the Rosenzweigs

Last Friday evening marked only the second Sabbath without David Rosenzweig upon the planet.

His family was caught on the hard ground between feeling his absence and his presence both, between the raw wound of his death and the comforting ache of his memory, between the overpowering human need to go on and the yearning to stay still in the exquisite agony of the moment.

Chavie Rosenzweig, his slim and lovely widow, stood with her mother, Gitel, and her mother-in-law, Fay, to light the Shabbas candles, the ritual that ushers in the weekly Jewish holy day that was so precious to the big, handsome man who so filled this house and the hearts in it.

Monday, July 29, 2002

The exception to the rule...

Yet another Arab calls for re-evaluation of Muslim/Arab values and a good, hard look at the decisions made and tactics used by Palestinians.

In an article titled "Why an Even More Difficult Future Awaits Us, Palestinians and Arabs,"(1) liberal Tunisian columnist Al-'Afif Al-Akhdhar wrote in the London-based Arabic daily Al-Hayat:

The Missed Opportunity of July 2000 and Its Consequences

"My generation opened its eyes with the loss of Palestine, and is about to shut them with the loss of the opportunity to retrieve what can be retrieved from it. No doubt, the Palestinian issue is the mother of all our issues, and its solution depends upon the possibility of bringing our societies to modernization, which in turn, is for us a matter of 'to be or not to be...'"

"Until 2000, the solution was within reach. But the Palestinian leaders refused to extend it a hand. This was the last costly missed opportunity to get back the land, and with it a measure of honor that would have been sufficient to heal our wound, which has bled since our defeat by Napoleon in 1798 and more since we were defeated by Ben-Gurion in 1948."

"Clinton presented proposals to the Palestinian leaders on a golden platter, and they answered him with an Intifada of armed struggle and suicide bombings - in an era when these are no longer appropriate. Thus, at one blow, we lost [both] the land ... and our reputation. The occupation army returned [to the territories] and in everyone's eyes our image was tarnished by egotism unprecedented in our history."

'The Vast Majority of Arab Intellectuals, the Arab Street, and 80% of the Palestinians - Supported Suicide Attacks'

"...Before our suicide operations against Israeli citizens, our image was one of men struggling for liberty. But when the most important Palestinian organizations - among them Fatah - became involved [in suicide attacks], and when the vast majority of Arab intellectuals, the Arab street, and 80% of the Palestinians - supported them, we were slapped with an image of a suicide [attacker] who disdains life - his life and the lives of others."

"When we lost the media war, our back was exposed to Sharon, who gave it a military and political knockout with the 'Defensive Wall' war, and then with 'Determined Path.' Thus, defeated, the Palestinian and Arab street submitted to bitterness over their fate, as happened on the morning of the 1967 defeat."